Monthly Archives: May 2010

Craig’s Explanation of The Kalam Cosmological Argument

I have had a lot of comments, objections and concerns on Craig’s Explanation of Cosmological Argument(Contingency Version) which most I believe is because of misunderstanding between Cosmological Argument Contingency Version and Temporal Version also known as The Kalam Cosmological Argument.

Craig’s Explanation of The Kalam Cosmological Argument

I have had a lot of comments, objections and concerns on Craig’s Explanation of Cosmological Argument(Contingency Version) which most I believe is because of misunderstanding between Cosmological Argument Contingency Version and Temporal Version also known as The Kalam Cosmological Argument.

Craig’s Explanation of Moral Argument

Because of comments, questions or misunderstandings of Moral Argument for the Existence of  God,in both Arguments for Existence God article, and The New Atheist’s Self-Deluded Logic or Self Exceptional Fallacy. I will give William Lane Craig’s explanation of Moral Argument

Craig’s Explanation of Moral Argument

Because of comments, questions or misunderstandings of Moral Argument for the Existence of  God,in both Arguments for Existence God article, and The New Atheist’s Self-Deluded Logic or Self Exceptional Fallacy. I will give William Lane Craig’s explanation of Moral Argument

Craig’s Explanation From Contingency

Since many questions or misunderstanding of Contingency version of Cosmological Argument for Existence of God, are being brought up in Arguments for Existence God article, I will give William Lane Craig’s explanation of Cosmological Argument, the Contingency Version. He is

Craig’s Explanation From Contingency

Since many questions or misunderstanding of Contingency version of Cosmological Argument for Existence of God, are being brought up in Arguments for Existence God article, I will give William Lane Craig’s explanation of Cosmological Argument, the Contingency Version. He is

I Never Knew How To Love

Love is patient and kind; love is not jealous or boastful;

it is not arrogant or rude. Love does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful;

it does not rejoice at wrong, but rejoices in the right.

Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.

Love never ends; as for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away.For our knowledge is imperfect and our prophecy is imperfect;

I Never Knew How To Love

Love is patient and kind; love is not jealous or boastful;

it is not arrogant or rude. Love does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful;

it does not rejoice at wrong, but rejoices in the right.

Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.

Love never ends; as for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away.For our knowledge is imperfect and our prophecy is imperfect;

New Atheist’s Self-Exceptional Fallacy Or Self-Deluded

Dawkin’s claim fails to satisfy Logical Thinking on the light of The Law of Non-contradiction . A cannot be B and non-B at the same time and in the same sense.

Therefore, Richard Dawkin’s New Atheist claim commits a “Self-Deluded” Logic namely A is evil and not-evil at the same time and in the same sense.

New Atheist’s Self-Exceptional Fallacy Or Self-Deluded

Dawkin’s claim fails to satisfy Logical Thinking on the light of The Law of Non-contradiction . A cannot be B and non-B at the same time and in the same sense.

Therefore, Richard Dawkin’s New Atheist claim commits a “Self-Deluded” Logic namely A is evil and not-evil at the same time and in the same sense.

Arguments for The Existence of God

I am going to give an outline of the Arguments for Existence of God, taken out of Natural Theology, and I will one by one, describe and explain the logic behind them, testing the truth of each premises and the validity of the arguments.(If you can not wait, click on the arguments to have William Lane Craig’s Explanation and how he answers Dawkin’s God Delusion and Dennett’s objections of the argument)

Arguments for The Existence of God

I am going to give an outline of the Arguments for Existence of God, taken out of Natural Theology, and I will one by one, describe and explain the logic behind them, testing the truth of each premises and the validity of the arguments.(If you can not wait, click on the arguments to have William Lane Craig’s Explanation and how he answers Dawkin’s God Delusion and Dennett’s objections of the argument)

It Is Well With My Soul

Horatio G. Spafford(1828-1888), Biblical Job of 1800′s lost his five years old son to fever, year after followed by losing almost everything to the great Chicago Fire, then two years later by losing his four daughters to the ‘Ville de

It Is Well With My Soul

Horatio G. Spafford(1828-1888), Biblical Job of 1800′s lost his five years old son to fever, year after followed by losing almost everything to the great Chicago Fire, then two years later by losing his four daughters to the ‘Ville de