Author Archives: Prayson Daniel
Matthews & Baker’s Simplified Ontological Argument
Gareth B. Matthews and Lynne Rudder Baker explained that Anselm’s ontological argument continues to fascinate philosophers as it still finds sophisticated defenders and critics. Matthews and Baker offered a dialogue-form version to restore the simplicity they believe is ignored or misrepresented
Matthews & Baker’s Simplified Ontological Argument
Gareth B. Matthews and Lynne Rudder Baker explained that Anselm’s ontological argument continues to fascinate philosophers as it still finds sophisticated defenders and critics. Matthews and Baker offered a dialogue-form version to restore the simplicity they believe is ignored or misrepresented
Jehovah’s Witnesses & Eisegesis of Revelation 3:14
Watchtower Society teaches Jehovah’s Witnesses that Jesus is not Jehovah God. Only the Father is Jehovah God. Concurring that Logos, was “existing in God’s form”(Philippians 5:5-11) the Society expounded its Christology as follows, He [prehumen Jesus] was a spirit person,
Jehovah’s Witnesses & Eisegesis of Revelation 3:14
Watchtower Society teaches Jehovah’s Witnesses that Jesus is not Jehovah God. Only the Father is Jehovah God. Concurring that Logos, was “existing in God’s form”(Philippians 5:5-11) the Society expounded its Christology as follows, He [prehumen Jesus] was a spirit person,
Abortion: It Is Her Body, It Is Her Choice?
Is it true that a woman’s body is her own business, and should not be a political issue? Should a woman be granted right to decide whatever happens in and to her body? This blog post explored the Bodily Autonomy
Abortion: It Is Her Body, It Is Her Choice?
Is it true that a woman’s body is her own business, and should not be a political issue? Should a woman be granted right to decide whatever happens in and to her body? This blog post explored the Bodily Autonomy
Human’s Responsibility in God’s Theatre
Until I read Genesis 20:4-6, Paul conclusion in Philippians 2:12-13 had continuously baffled me. Commending unity that can only be achieved through humility in the church in Philippi, Paul asked Philippians to learn not to do anything out of selfish
Human’s Responsibility in God’s Theatre
Until I read Genesis 20:4-6, Paul conclusion in Philippians 2:12-13 had continuously baffled me. Commending unity that can only be achieved through humility in the church in Philippi, Paul asked Philippians to learn not to do anything out of selfish
Omnipotent God and The Paradox of the Stone
The concept of an omnipotent being, namely a being with maximal perfection with respect to power, is sometimes believed to involve a contradiction. The most popular reductio ad absurdum case against the existence of omnipotent being is known as “the
Omnipotent God and The Paradox of the Stone
The concept of an omnipotent being, namely a being with maximal perfection with respect to power, is sometimes believed to involve a contradiction. The most popular reductio ad absurdum case against the existence of omnipotent being is known as “the
Anselm’s Ontological Argument
In chapter 2 of Anselm’s Discourse On The Existence of God, Anselm set forth, what was later tagged, by Immanuel Kant, ontological argument, as follows: [And] so, Lord, do thou, who dost give understanding to faith, give me, so far as
Anselm’s Ontological Argument
In chapter 2 of Anselm’s Discourse On The Existence of God, Anselm set forth, what was later tagged, by Immanuel Kant, ontological argument, as follows: [And] so, Lord, do thou, who dost give understanding to faith, give me, so far as
Probing Shand’s Refutation of the Existence of God
An associate lecturer in Philosophy at The Open University, John Shand, presented an interesting argument against the existence of mainstream traditional monotheist’s God. Shand’s refutation is based on what he believes to be the incoherence of a thinking omniscient, omnipotent
Probing Shand’s Refutation of the Existence of God
An associate lecturer in Philosophy at The Open University, John Shand, presented an interesting argument against the existence of mainstream traditional monotheist’s God. Shand’s refutation is based on what he believes to be the incoherence of a thinking omniscient, omnipotent
Prayson Daniel
